Princeton Humidor Collection

MOTT Masthead CigarNexus Logo

  

Volume 4 Number 7

July, 1999


Hi Steve,  

You have my permission to reproduce this in whole or part on Cigar Nexus.

I was just reading the preamble to your latest MOTT and it certainly struck a few chords with me.

First of all, currently my only real contact with the 'cigar world' via the internet is Cigar Nexus and the occasional peek at "Cigar Advertiser Online" (you know the one - the magazine that Marvin Shanken prints on the back of cigar ads). I used to be a devout reader of ASC but then something terrible happened - the newsfeed dropped. Smoke Nazis are filtering ASC out of our feed!! I'm not joking either, my ISP has changed feeds 4 times and each time, ASC is there but with no content!! They are convinced that it is being filtered (as are all other alt.smoking resources) by someone higher up the food chain.

My first contact with the MOTT was when I saw it posted on ASC. I thought it was a terrific idea and read it end to end every time.

In response to the points mentioned in your preamble, I'd like to make a few of my own:

  • The MOTT may not be the only such test, but it was certainly the first non-commercial blind tasting and without a doubt the best and most worth reading.
  • It is concise and doesn't make the mistake that the others
    do and have too many cigars reviewed. I often wonder just how it is possible for testers to carefully and thoughtfully blind taste up to five cigars of each (that's their claim - they say they try 3 to 5 of each to gauge consistency) of up to (and recently over) 100 'different' cigars in less than 2 months.
  • It is truly 'blind'. It is impossible for the magazines to have people NOT know at least some of the cigars, I mean they'd have to have some people fully employed, off-site, preparing and de/re-labeling the cigars for the testers. On more than one occasion CA testers dropped the ball and have shown some prior knowledge of the brand. I remember one comment saying "this cigar didn't live up to its reputation". How would they know if it was a blind test?
  • You sample the widest range of people and palates by random selection of volunteers. Not just cronies who have shown themselves to be loyal yes-men and have exactly the same tastes as you. This gives the cigar the fairest chance.
  • You don't test any 'bullshit' brands. No 'club labels' or re-badged brands, no obscure types, no 'here-today gone-tomorrow' or fly-by-night brands or ridiculously new brands. Just real cigars that your average joe can get (with the odd Cuban exception).
  • You have nothing to gain by a good or bad review and don't offer any advertising to manufacturers to obtain better reviews.
  • You have absolutely no control over what the reviewers say or how they rate the cigars. You are only at the mercy of the postal service with regards to the state of the cigars on arrival. (from experience, you generally pack them well enough to survive being run over by a truck with nothing more than a 'slightly cracked wrapper').
  • The information offered is presented in a readable format and offers the most detail of any such test, commercial or otherwise.

In short, I'm not surprised that the 'big boys' pay attention. I spoke to a rep from one manufacturer a short while ago and they said that "no serious cigar company would pay any attention to CA's ratings, especially now the boom is over and the magazine is becoming thinner and thinner". This is a review that they CAN believe - it's a true consumer survey.

Now, once your good wife has helped you get your head down to normal size ;-) please understand that these comments are not about toadying or 'sucking-up' (but thanks for all the cigars anyway...) but are simply my observations of the MOTT, based on having read every one of them.

Steve, keep the MOTTs coming. The only thing I'd like to see on Cigar Nexus is MORE STUFF!!!! More editorial content, maybe a 'letters to editor' section and perhaps some freelance material if anybody cares to submit it for editing (I'd be happy to).

Best Regards,

Norman Lever

                           

What can I say, but thanks Norm! Every day my mailbox is filled with all sorts of garbage, but it makes my week to open up and read an email like this. Although I wish I could promise you more content for CigarNexus.com, I can not, as neither Jonni nor I have any additional free time. In fact, as you can see by the untimely publication of this MOTT we are constantly behind. The MOTT and CigarNexus.com are something that we work on as time allows and recently it hasn't allowed any.

Although tardy, I hope you find this issue of the MOTT worth the wait. As always, I greatly appreciate your and everyone's continued readership and support for this endeavor...thanks.

This month's tasters were:

Tom Farrington
Andy Marinkovich
Brent Winkelman

This is an interesting panel of tasters. Our first being a relatively new cigar smoker - welcome to the "club" Tom! The second is the former Managing Editor of SMOKE magazine who has a ton of cigar taste testing experience. Our third panelist is a gentleman who gave up on cigarettes and began smoking cigars two years ago. I would like to extend my personal thanks for their efforts on our behalf.



Tom Farrington

"I'm a fairly new smoker, starting about 6 months ago. I quickly ran into the typical beginner's problem of discovering a decent smoke at an affordable price. The extreme increase in tobacco taxes here in CA has put a number of shops out of business, which ironically helped me, as former owners have been liquidating their stocks at blowout prices! I've settled on Havana Sunrise Coronas as my "regular" smoke and have also set aside some Tamboril Coronas and a few Don Xavier Coronas, which are good when they're good. Very inconsistent quality. I average 3-5 cigars a week. Can't wait for next month's shipment from Saka! This is a job for life, right?!?"


Andy Marinkovich

"As an editor at SMOKE Magazine, I have opportunities to smoke many great cigars, which I take full advantage of. Personally, I prefer rich, full-bodied cigars, so I like to smoke Cuban cigars the most. My current favorite Cuban cigars are Raphael Gonzalez Lonsdale, Bolivar Royal Corona and Corona Extra, H.Upmann Magnum 46, and Punch Punch. My favorite non-Cuban cigars at the moment are AVO Domain, Hoyo de Monterrey Seleccion Royale, Fuente Chateau Sun-Grown, and CAO L'Anniversaire. I also appreciate a good mild cigar from time to time, of which I've found Ashton, Davidoff, and Moore & Bode to be the best. I probably smoke on average, about 1-2 cigars per day."


Brent Winkelman

"Previously smoked a pipe for 2 years and cigarettes for 10. Quit for several years and took up cigars in May 1997. My number one criterion for a cigar: construction. Nothing worse than having a relaxing moment tormented by fighting with a cigar. Normally enjoy medium to full cigars (Padron, J.R. Ultimates, HdM Excalibur, ERDM) but still find pleasure in Leon Jimenes, Casa Blanca Reserve. La Flor de Dominicana, Hemingways. Recent favorite: La Tradicion Reserve."


The five cigars blind taste tested for us were:

   Habana La Flor de Cano Selectos

 


   Romeo y Julieta Romeos

   Napa Nicaraguan
Selection Rothschild

   Habana Saint Luis Rey Regios

   Dunhill Honduran
Corona Grandes

All of the particulars were rated within a simplified "check the appropriate box" type scheme, and each taster was encouraged to make personal comments. The comment sections are typed just as it was written so that it is verbatim for everyone's review.

And finally on to the taste test!


Habana La Flor de Cano Selectos

made in: Havana, Cuba 
size   : 5 7/8 x 41
wrapper: Cuba
filler : Cuba
binder : Cuba 
price  : $5.00  

Appearance = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx ----- xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Even med./dark brown maduro wrapper, average veining, slightly oily sheen. Andy said - Some thick veins, but overall the wrapper is clean and evenly colored, with a decent amount of shine. Brent said - Varied colored wrapper. Spotty. Obvious seams. Rugged cap.
Construction = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Didn't live up to appearance, very tight, hard feeling. Andy said - Firm and fairly even from head to foot. The cap is kind of sloppy. Overall this cigar looks and feels good, though not great. Brent said - Slight box press feel. Firm. Initially a tight draw that improved after one inch. Quite well made.
Burn = very uneven uneven even very even Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Problems = runners tunneling got soft split/unraveled Tom : Andy : xx Brent:
Ash Color = black dark grey light grey white Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx (almost black)
Ash Structure = flaky typical very solid Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Draw = too easy easy perfect tight plugged Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx (but improved)
Aroma = rank! poor fair good great Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Smoked to = left>=1/2 1/3 to band <band nub Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Strength = bland mild medium full powerful Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Taste = Tom said - Almost plugged, re-snipped as far as I dared and re-lit. Still tight. Put down and let settle. Draw improved dramatically. Full tobacco flavor with a bit of spice. Developed strength and a bit of richness last 1/3. Sour/astringent aftertaste. Andy said - Heavy cedary flavor at first. Full-bodied with a flavor that jumped around from dirty and earthy to well-rounded, rich and strong. Lots of flavor, but overall a bit rough. May have been better if the draw was not so tight. Brent said - Delightful pre-light "barnyard" aroma, very rich. Started out tasting young. After an inch, slightly sweet and somewhat fruity. Stayed that way to the end. Average aftertaste.
Overall Impression = Tom said - A bit of a puzzle. Didn't have complexity I expected and construction problems would bar a recommendation if typical. Andy said - A rough and strong cigar with some appealing flavor, but poor construction detracted. It has body, but lacks balance. Some Cuban-like taste, but I'll guess this is of Mexican origin, and probably cheap. I would not recommend based on a tight draw, but I might if the draw is better for those who like rough, in-your-face cigars. Brent said - Enjoyable, but did not leave me begging for more. Not a bad smoke if not more than $3.00. Slow to sour.
Would you recommend this cigar as one to try based on your blind taste??? (Editors Note - remember these guys don't have a clue what cigar they just smoked or what it costs.) Tom said - no Andy said - no Brent said - yes

Habana La Flor de Cano Selectos

   SCALE

YOWZA!!! Great Smoke Good Cigar Decent/Worthy <--- Andy & Brent Ho-Hum <--- Tom Blah... Dog Rocket!

Editor's 2 Cents - La Flor de Cano is a small Havana brand that was introduced in 1891 by Juan and Tomas Cano. Over the years this blend has gone through a variety of changes including being temporarily discontinued. Today the entire line consists of only twelve cigars, eight of which are machine made to some degree. The four handmade sizes are very rare, and are considered some of Havana's finest mild cigars, while the machine-mades are easy to come by, relatively inexpensive, and are of considerably different quality.

The La Flor de Cano Selectos used in the MOTT was machine-made with a hand finished wrapper. The Selectos is probably the most common La Flor de Cano available on the world market and is reasonably priced for a Cuban cigar. They tend to be rather rough in appearance with mottled wrappers being the norm. As for the construction it varies from box to box, some burn and draw well, while others are far too tight or too loose. Typically, the flavor is a strong biting grassy and dirty edge that is unpalatable. This cigar lacks depth overall.

Sometimes it is possible to get a box that is quite good. If only there were some way to tell before smoking them, because when they are good, they prove to be an excellent value. Overall, though the Habana La Flor de Cano Selectos is of marginal smoking value and far too inconsistent to recommend. Your five dollars would be much better spent on another cigar.



Romeo y Julieta Romeos

made in: Santiago, Dominican Republic 
size   : 6 x 46
wrapper: Indonesia
filler : Brazil, Dominican Republic
binder : USA/Connecticut 
price  : $6.00

Appearance = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx ------ xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Attractive slim perfecto. Light veining. Greenish (claro) wrapper. Had some spots and variations in color. Dry looking. Andy said - The medium brown wrapper has very light spots and minimal veins. Very clean appearance. It looks like one of the new Hoyo Seleccion Royales. Brent said - Love the shape. Small dark spots all over wrapper. No pre-light odor.
Construction = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Firm along length. Nice tight wrapper. Excellent cap and end. Andy said - Cool teardrop shape. Looks and feels well rolled. Very tight and firm, but a bit light weight. Overall, this is a well-rolled cigar. Brent said - Very firm cigar. Nearly perfect.
Burn = very uneven uneven even very even Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Problems = runners tunneling got soft split/unraveled Tom : Andy : xx (minor) Brent:
Ash Color = black dark grey light grey white Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Ash Structure = flaky typical very solid Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Draw = too easy easy perfect tight plugged Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Aroma = rank! poor fair good great Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Smoked to = left>=1/2 1/3 to band <band nub Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Strength = bland mild medium full powerful Tom : xx ---- xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Taste = Tom said - Very mild at first light due to wrapper. Leathery with a bit of pepper for the first 1/3. Smoothed out and richened up for the last half with nice hazelnut overtones to finish. Andy said - Medium-bodied with a mouth filling, rich, earthy flavor. Very smooth and very flavorful, and it never gets boring. I appreciated the consistency of the flavor which was good to the end. I smoked it before lunch and it was very satisfying. Brent said - Bland initially, but a well aged tobacco flavor kicked in just past the closed foot. Ever so slightly sweet. Quite enjoyable. Smooth.
Overall Impression = Tom said - Good smoke. Not great complexity or flavor, but pleasant with a nice appearance. I'd put up a few if they were reasonable. Andy said - I really enjoyed this cigar, which I swear is a Hoyo de Monterrey Seleccion Royale "Aristocrat," but didn't you review that cigar on MOTT recently? Either way, it's a great smoke. Brent said - A very pleasant cigar. Would buy if not too expensive.
Would you recommend this cigar as one to try based on your blind taste??? (Editors Note - remember these guys don't have a clue what cigar they just smoked or what it costs.) Tom said - yes Andy said - yes Brent said - yes

Romeo y Julieta Romeos

   SCALE

YOWZA!!! Great Smoke <--- Andy Good Cigar <--- Tom & Brent Decent/Worthy Ho-Hum Blah... Dog Rocket!

Editor's 2 Cents - The Dominican Romeo y Julieta brand has once again started showing up on tobacconists' shelves after nearly a two-year absence. This trademark has changed ownership and blends numerous times in recent history. The current owner and maker is Tabacalera de Espana and they have begun to reintroduce the brand. One notable change in this cigar is the replacement of their Cameroon wrappers with an Indonesian leaf.

The Romeo y Julieta Romeo is a classic teardrop shaped perfecto. Sadly the dull wrapper on this figurado detracts from it otherwise appealing appearance. The draw is excellent once you surpass the shoulder of the closed foot. It produces a thick pull of smoke with a medium bodied blend of leather and cedar with definite spicy sweet notes. All three of our tasters noted how smooth a cigar this is to smoke. Its flavor is consistent throughout and the aftertaste is light in the mouth.

Overall this figurado is a pleasing and relaxing cigar to smoke. It is not a cigar I would choose to pair with a stout single malt, but is an excellent mid-afternoon diversion. I would also recommend it to cigar smokers who cut their teeth on milder Dominicans and are looking for a "next step." The new Romeo y Julieta Romeos is well worth your sampling.



Napa Nicaraguan Selection Rothschild

made in: Esteli, Nicaragua 
size   : 4 3/4 x 50
wrapper: Indonesia
filler : Nicaragua
binder : Nicaragua 
price  : $6.00  

Appearance = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Stocky robusto. Rich, dark brown maduro color w/ oily sheen. Light veining. Andy said - The medium-brown wrapper looks a bit stretched. The color is fairly consistent, but there are a few blemishes that mar this cigar's overall appearance. Brent said - Slopped on cap. Varied colored wrapper.
Construction = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - A bit soft along its length, otherwise good. Andy said - Feels loose and there's a hard spot near the head, but overall it looks and feels well-rolled. Brent said - Looks nice. Felt okay. Looks can be deceiving. IMHO under-filled.
Burn = very uneven uneven even very even Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Problems = runners tunneling got soft split/unraveled Tom : Andy : Brent: xx
Ash Color = black dark grey light grey white Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Ash Structure = flaky typical very solid Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Draw = too easy easy perfect tight plugged Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Aroma = rank! poor fair good great Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Smoked to = left>=1/2 1/3 to band <band nub Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Strength = bland mild medium full powerful Tom : xx ---- xx Andy : xx ---- xx Brent: xx
Taste = Tom said - Very easy draw with lots of smoke and light spices. Only kept getting better with tasty cinnamon, orange, and chocolate overtones. Couldn't put it down. One of the best I've smoked. Andy said - Definitely Nicaraguan-like flavor. Full-bodied, but not powerful, with a rich, sweet, floral, earthy flavor, that is very distinct and smooth. It got a little bitter in the last third, but overall I really liked the way this cigar smokes and the way it tastes. Brent said - Started out mild, then tunneled and turned harsh. Burned ashes for an aftertaste.
Overall Impression = Tom said - This one gets the best of show for me. I'll take a box! Andy said - A good cigar. It provides a lot of complexity and flavor yet never gets harsh or overpowering, although it does get a little hot and bitter towards the end. Brent said - Looked a lot better than it tasted. I'll pass.
Would you recommend this cigar as one to try based on your blind taste??? (Editors Note - remember these guys don't have a clue what cigar they just smoked or what it costs.) Tom said - yes Andy said - yes Brent said - no

Napa Nicaraguan Selection Rothschild

   SCALE

YOWZA!!! Great Smoke <--- Tom Good Cigar <--- Andy Decent/Worthy Ho-Hum Blah... Dog Rocket! <--- Brent

Editor's 2 Cents - The Napa Cigar Company was among the hundreds of the new cigar companies that cropped up during the boom. They introduced two lines in late 1996 - a Dominican blend and a Nicaraguan blend. Then in 1997 they added their reserve line that included another cigar from the Dominican and one from the Canary Islands. Although many companies have faltered, the Napa Cigar Company continues to produce and ship cigars to retailers.

The Nicaraguan Selection Rothschild is a 4 3/4" robusto with a dark Indonesian finely veined wrapper. The wrapper on some of the samples I smoked was pulled too tight and the cap was poorly applied. Also, I found the draw on the cigars to vary from smoke to smoke, ranging from being too loose due to under filling while others were actually too tight to enjoy. This mild-medium bodied cigar delivered a unique smooth sweet floral flavor, but the final third did turn bitter on my palate. The aroma was pleasant to the nose.

Two of our tasters really enjoyed this cigar, however it did not suit my fancy. I found the floral notes too strong for my taste buds and the inconsistent construction unacceptable. Personally I would not typically recommend this cigar but given that we split 2/2, I suggest you try a Napa Nicaraguan Selection Robusto to see if it is a cigar for you.



Habana Saint Luis Rey Regios

made in: Havana, Cuba  
size   : 5 x 48
wrapper: Cuba
filler : Cuba
binder : Cuba 
price  : $12.00  

Appearance = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Beautifully colored colorado robusto. Fabulous reddish brown w/ oily sheen. Flat cap. Very light even veining. I saved it for last based on appearance alone! Andy said - Slightly box pressed. The medium-brown wrapper looks a bit rough, with streaks and marks. Looks like a Cuban triple cap! Brent said - Nearly perfect. Very mild pre-light aroma. A beautiful looking cigar.
Construction = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Firm and resilient. Very evenly textured. Rich dark color. Andy said - Firm, but not too hard. Good, consistent shape. Well packed. Overall, a well-rolled stogie. Brent said - Firm throughout. Very easy to smoke.
Burn = very uneven uneven even very even Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Problems = runners tunneling got soft split/unraveled Tom : Andy : [none reported by any taster] Brent:
Ash Color = black dark grey light grey white Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Ash Structure = flaky typical very solid Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Draw = too easy easy perfect tight plugged Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Aroma = rank! poor fair good great Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Smoked to = left>=1/2 1/3 to band <band nub Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Strength = bland mild medium full powerful Tom : xx ---- xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Taste = Tom said - Rather plain, medium tobacco bite at first lighting. Smoothed out a bit to a somewhat flat tobacco flavor through the first half. Gained fullness towards the end with good richness and a bit of spice. Lots of smoke. Andy said - Wow! This raw, powerful cigar almost overpowered me! It starts with a brash, stinging assault that doesn't relent. Likely a Havana, but a young one. It's strong and earthy, but one dimensional due to its youthful qualities. Brent said - Started out bold, but mellowed quickly. Straight forward tobacco taste. Well-aged. Mild, yet pleasing aftertaste. I really liked it.
Overall Impression = Tom said - A good smoke, I wish it had developed more quickly. Last half was worth the wait. Andy said - I'm pretty sure it's Cuban, but I'd age it for a while. I like this kind of cigar, and Havana lovers will too. However, this will overpower many smokers. Brent said - Very relaxing cigar. Practically smoked itself. I would buy these. Best cigar of the five. Please send a box for further evaluation!
Would you recommend this cigar as one to try based on your blind taste??? (Editors Note - remember these guys don't have a clue what cigar they just smoked or what it costs.) Tom said - yes Andy said - yes Brent said - yes

Habana Saint Luis Rey Regios

   SCALE

YOWZA!!! Great Smoke Good Cigar <--- Tom, Andy & Brent Decent/Worthy Ho-Hum Blah... Dog Rocket!

Editor's 2 Cents - This Havana blend was created over 50 years ago by British importers for the English market. The name and marquee was adopted after the success of the American film The Bridge of San Luis Rey based on Thorton Wilder's play. This is a small line of superior quality handmades consisting of only six different vitolas. Regretfully this brand is often confused with the Cuban-made San Luis Rey that are mass marketed in Germany. They are two entirely different cigars and you should not confuse the two even though they have similar artwork and names.

The Saint Luis Rey Regios is a classic Hermosos No. 4 sized robusto that is available box pressed in dress boxes of 25 or "in the round" with 50 count cabinets. As with all the Cuban SLR line, its construction is of outstanding quality. In youth it is a bold brash cigar that is chocked full of leather, wood, and peppery spice. This cigar is the epitome of the description "spicy." In fact, it is commonly too strong for many cigar smokers. However time really tempers this cigar, given three years to age this smoke settles into becoming one of the more soothing milder Havanas, yet it retains a wonderfully complex array of flavors for the aficionado to enjoy. In both its youth and maturity, this cigars flavor and aroma leaves little doubt as to its pedigree. Those used for the taste test were just at a year old.

This cigar is highly sought after by Cuban cigar junkies worldwide and because of the limited production numbers it can prove to be difficult to obtain. Thankfully this brand's marquee is not as popular with the general public as Cohiba or Romeo y Julieta so the prices on these remain reasonable considering they are Havanas. The Saint Luis Rey Regios is a great cigar and is highly recommended for the experienced smoker.


Dunhill Honduran Corona Grandes

made in: Honduras
size   : 6 1/2 x 43
wrapper: Indonesia
filler : Mexico
binder : DR, Mexico, and Brazil 
price  : $6.65  

Appearance = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx --- xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Lt. medium-brown. Very dry looking. Greater than average veining. Andy said - Nice looking. The wrapper has a fine grain of tooth and a few green spots. Clean consistent, medium-brown color. Brent said - Almost no pre-light aroma.
Construction = poor fair good outstanding perfect Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx Tom said - Dull looking & had several splits in end and along length. Wrapper split and unraveled about halfway through. Tight feeling, but burned very well even with the problems. Andy said - Very firm and tightly rolled. Good density for a thin cigar. Very even from head to foot. Brent said - Nice and firm. Maybe too firm.
Burn = very uneven uneven even very even Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Problems = runners tunneling got soft split/unraveled Tom : xx Andy : Brent:
Ash Color = black dark grey light grey white Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Ash Structure = flaky typical very solid Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Draw = too easy easy perfect tight plugged Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Aroma = rank! poor fair good great Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Smoked to = left>=1/2 1/3 to band <band nub Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Strength = bland mild medium full powerful Tom : xx Andy : xx Brent: xx
Taste = Tom said - Light leathery/woody taste at first. Developed nutty flavors toward the end. Reminded me very much of a Don Xavier Corona. Andy said - Mild to medium bodied. Very smooth - this cigar tasted of well-aged tobacco. A mixed bag, though. It's smooth earthy core gives it body, but at times it bordered on bland. Overall, an enjoyable smoke that got better at the end. Brent said - Nearly none. Very bland.
Overall Impression = Tom said - Decent light mild smoke with good flavor. If physical problems are typical, can't recommend. Andy said - I'd say this is a high quality cigar, judging by the solid construction, and the smooth, well-aged flavor. Not an ass-kicker, but solid. Brent said - Just plain awful! I must find out what this is so I never, ever buy them!
Would you recommend this cigar as one to try based on your blind taste??? (Editors Note - remember these guys don't have a clue what cigar they just smoked or what it costs.) Tom said - no Andy said - yes Brent said - no

Dunhill Honduran Corona Grandes

   SCALE

YOWZA!!! Great Smoke Good Cigar <--- Andy Decent/Worthy <--- Tom Ho-Hum Blah... Dog Rocket! <--- Brent

Editor's 2 Cents - Alfred Dunhill is a legendary name in the cigar business. This English company has been importing fine Cuban cigars and accoutrements for well over a century. It was responsible for helping launch the Montecristo blend in 1935. Also, it imported ultra-premium Havanas under the name Dunhill Super Seleccion and sold the infamous Cuban house brands of Don Candido and Don Alfredo. It even had a Havana brand called Dunhill that was discontinued in 1991. From there Dunhill began producing cigars in the Dominican Republic and the Canary Islands. The new Dunhill Honduran Selection was created to introduce a fuller bodied Dunhill cigar to the market.

The Dunhill Honduran Coronas Grandes is classic lonsdale shape with a colorado brown wrapper. It sports the new green Dunhill ring that makes it easy to recognize its Honduran origin. I have found that most of the samples were too tightly rolled and had a tough draw as a result. The blend is smooth, so smooth that it is a total snoozer. I smoked a dozen of these looking for some sort of flavor to develop and each one proved to be more boring than the last. The only flavor of note was a slightly sweet finish it left on my palate.

Being a longtime smoker, I can not help but remember just how great Dunhill brand cigars used to be. Although I miss the Havanas, their original Dominican cigars were excellent mild smokes, however today they have become marginal. And this new Honduran line is a total disappointment. Whoever blended this cigar really missed the mark on what Honduran cigar smokers desire in a cigar. I suggest you skip the Dunhill Coronas Grandes because not only can you buy a much better Honduran cigar, but you will have money left over for an excellent double shot of espresso to enjoy as well.



The drawing for next month's MOTTley crew of tasters yielded the following names:

Ted Arnold
Roger Farnsworth
Owen Seaton

Congrats to you three, and your cigars are on their way!

To enter Saka's Monthly Officious Taste Test pool all you have to do is fill out the automated entry form by selecting the "become a taster" icon at the top. Your entry will be added to the pool from which I draw the names each month. Also if you haven't read the previous Monthly Officious Taste Tests then I suggest you give them a look over with a cigar in hand.

As always, thank you for your continued readership and support!

Saka Signature
Steven T. Saka
saka@cigarnexus.com
http://www.cigarnexus.com


[ Home | Welcome | MOTT | Contest | SSS | Museum | Scrapbook | JC's Facts | Interview | Newswire | Counsel | Email ]
Princeton Humidor Collection
The CigarNexus Logo

Copyright ©1998, 1999 Nexus InterMedia LLC. All rights reserved.
MOTT is a trademark of Nexus InterMedia LLC